Sunday, March 30, 2014

Crucial IPCC report assessing impact of climate change to be releasedin Yokohama, Japan on early Monday morning (March 31, 2014)





UN panel report likely to point out risk to Asian cities
Vishwa Mohan,TNN | Mar 30, 2014, 02.13AM IST 
NEW DELHI: A UN panel will on Monday come out with its much-awaited report, assessing region-specific impact of climate change on human settlements and natural resources including drinking water and food-grain production. The report to be released in Yokohama, Japan, is likely to predict how many Asian cities including Mumbai, Kolkata, Dhaka and Bangkok may be at risk due to rising sea level.

The panel, comprising hundreds of scientists and government representatives from across the globe, on Saturday finalized its report after a marathon five-day long meeting.

Though a 'leaked' draft of this report - which first appeared in 'The Guardian' in UK - took the suspense out of this process, findings of this Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) still have potential to jolt the policymakers across the world.

Besides predicting displacement of millions of people from low lying areas and wiping off trillions of dollars from the global economy, experts may also forecast increasing risk of violent human conflict in many parts of the world due to tremendous pressure on available resources including drinking water.

"This report will, for the first time, look at the effects of climate change as a series of risks - with those risks multiplying as temperatures warm," said 'The Guardian'.

Chris Field, co-chair of Working Group II of the IPCC, too had articulated this and its importance on the occasion of the beginning of scrutiny round of the report in Yokohama on March 25.

He said, "This report considers consequences of climate changes that have already occurred and the risks across a range of possible futures. It considers every region and many sectors, ranging from oceans to human security."

Field also emphasized that "the focus (of this report) is as much on identifying effective responses as on understanding challenges."

According to 'leaked' draft of the report, the experts will predict severe impacts of global warming on food-grain production, fresh-water resources and human settlements across the globe with Asia facing the brunt of it.

They will predict that the climate change will reduce median yields by up to 2% per decade for the rest of the 21st century, against a backdrop of rising demand of food-grains by 14% per decade until 2050. The reference of Indo-Gangetic plains (India) may also be there in this context in the final report.

They may also come out with the findings on the status of Himalayan glaciers. Unlike the 2007 IPCC report which had initially wrongly predicted that all Himalayan ice might melt by 2035, the experts this time may talk in specifics predicting the loss to the extent of 29% by 2035.

Certain media reports, while referring to sub-chapters of the leaked draft ahead of the Yokohama round, mentioned about the projection which may range from 2% gain to a 29% loss by 2035 - affecting the available fresh-water resources in India and China or affecting weather in that part of the globe.

Just to avoid a blunder of 2007 which was subsequently corrected by issuing an 'errata', the experts this time are learnt to have scrutinized every word of the upcoming report which is part two (WR-II) of a four-part assessment. The first part, which had come out in September last year, dealt with the "physical science basis of climate change," citing "unequivocal" evidence that humans are the dominant cause of global warming.

The third report (WR-III), assessing mitigation of climate change, will be finalized next month whereas the final report will be completed as a synthesis document in October. All these findings of the panel will lay a perfect ground for negotiators from across the globe who, under the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC), have been working to bring out a universal climate deal in Paris in 2015.

IPCC chairman, R K Pachauri, had summed up the efforts during his Yokohama address. He said that the timing and contents of the assessment report (AR5) ensure that "there would be adequate attention given to the findings brought out by the IPCC for facilitating an appropriate conclusion to the current round of negotiations under the Convention"................http://epaper.timesofindia.com/Repository/ml.asp?Ref=Q0FQLzIwMTQvMDMvMzAjQXIwMTkwMQ==&Mode=Gif&Locale=english-skin-custom

Saturday, March 29, 2014

GM processed food products are all over in Indian markets.......there is hardly any check

http://t.co/UOvfxqqMSp

Indians consuming imported GM-processed food, parliamentary panel says
Vishwa Mohan,TNN | Mar 29, 2014, 06.36AM IST 

A Parliamentary panel has brought this out in the open by pointing out shortcomings in the functioning of the Food Safety and Standards Authority of India (FSSAI), which has failed miserably to check import of such products.
NEW DELHI: India doesn't allow commercial cultivation of genetically modified (GM) crops but Indians may well be consuming GM processed food- knowingly or un-knowingly.

A Parliamentary panel has brought this out in the open by pointing out shortcomings in the functioning of the Food Safety and Standards Authority of India (FSSAI), which has failed miserably to check import of such products.

Taking note of the government's response over various issues concerning GM food crops, the committee on agriculture - which submitted its report to Lok Sabha speaker on March 15 - pointed out that "there is no check on GM processed food and other items coming from outside the country or being produced here" in India.

It gave an example of cotton seed oil, produced in the country from Bt Cotton which is the only genetically modified crop allowed for commercial production. The cotton seed oil is, incidentally, widely used in India as cooking oil.

After making its point, the panel - headed by CPM Lok Sabha MP Basudeb Acharia - also asked the government to "investigate the matter without further loss of time".

The panel's report comes at the time when the ministry of environment and forest (MoEF) is planning to keep in abeyance its controversial August, 2007 notification - which allows the import of GM foods into India without its prior permission - for another three or six months, beginning April 1.

The required order will be notified by the ministry soon as the period of existing notification will expire on March 31.

The ministry has continuously been keeping the notification in abeyance since February 2008. At present, any genetically engineered organism can be imported (either for research or for restricted lab trial) only after the prior permission Genetic Engineering Approval Committee (GEAC).

The ministry's order, keeping the 2007 notification in abeyance, has been in tune with what the Supreme Court's direction in response to a petition six years ago. The court had directed the ministry to put such order on hold till the controversial issue of transgenic crops is finally decided by it. The apex court will begin its hearing on April 14......................http://epaper.timesofindia.com/Repository/ml.asp?Ref=VE9JS00vMjAxNC8wMy8yOSNBcjAxMzAw&Mode=Gif&Locale=english-skin-custom

Friday, March 28, 2014

Issue of GM food crops generated lot of heat under UPA Govt in India ...... over to new government

http://t.co/akQ5ep25aS

Parliamentary panel slams Moily over field trials issue of GM crops
Vishwa Mohan,TNN | Mar 27, 2014, 09.20PM IST 
NEW DELHI: Recent government's decision to allow field trials of genetically modified (GM) food crops has come under severe attack of a parliamentary committee which also criticized the environment minister M Veerappa Moily for giving his nod to this effect.

The panel suggested that any test should not be undertaken till the Centre puts in place all regulatory, monitoring, oversight and surveillance structure.

Referring to the recent decision of Moily and the government's regulator Genetic Engineering Appraisal Committee (GEAC), the panel on agriculture in its latest report said, "the Committee strongly deprecates this" as it is contrary to its earlier recommendation.

Moily had recently given his go ahead for field trials of over 200 transgenic varieties of GM crops which had got clearance from the GEAC in its meeting in March last year. Subsequently, the government's regulator had on March 21 re-validated 10 varieties of transgenic crops including wheat, rice, maize and cotton and allowed multi-national seed companies to go for "confined field trials" of these varieties.

Close on the heels of these decisions and the parliamentary committee's report, various farmers' organizations -- including the pro-BJP Swadeshi Jagran Manch - have, meanwhile, written to the Election Commission, urging it to issue direction to the government to withhold the recent permissions of field trials.

These organizations, in their letters to the chief election commissioner V S Sampath on Wednesday, also demanded issuing an order to stop any fresh permission in the upcoming meeting till the election process are over.

They said that the government's recent decision amounted to violation of the model of conduct as it was taken to benefit the ruling party.

Though the arguments forwarded by these farmers' bodies were not new as similar points had been raised earlier by many anti-GM groups like Greenpeace and Coalition for GM Free India in their letters to the EC, its timing made it more relevant in view of the parliamentary panel's findings and recommendations.

The panel, which has been looking into "prospects and effects" of cultivation of GM food crops in the country, in its report to the Lok Sabha speaker on March 15, noted that the government had failed to furnish proper replies to various questions raised during the committee's proceedings.

It said any new "research and development" on transgenic varieties of crops should be done only in strict containment and field trials should not be undertaken till the government puts in place "all regulatory, monitoring, oversight, surveillance and other structures".

The parliamentary committee, headed by CPM Lok Sabha MP Basudeb Acharia, also criticized the government over the composition of existing regulatory body, saying "it would be in the fitness of things, if GEAC is headed by a technical expert rather than by a bureaucrat".

Referring to the GEAC's earlier decision in the case of Bt Brinjal, the committee asked how the regulatory mechanism had missed the 30% increase in "toxic alkaloid" in it and approved it for environmental release as all these developments could have devastating effects on environment and human and live stock health.

The Committee has, in its 59th report, also pointed out that "there is no check on GM processed food and other items coming from outside the country or being produced here" like cotton seed oil produced from Bt Cotton...........................http://epaper.timesofindia.com/Repository/ml.asp?Ref=VE9JS00vMjAxNC8wMy8yOCNBcjAwODAx&Mode=Gif&Locale=english-skin-custom

Wednesday, March 26, 2014

What is the truth Mr Prime Minister? ..... the whistleblower doesn't seem to rest till he gets to the bottom of the alleged politicians-bureaucrats nexus

http://t.co/FtsK3tP1pn

Whistleblower writes to PM, says PMO officials withholding info
Vishwa Mohan,TNN | Mar 26, 2014, 04.52AM IST 
NEW DELHI: Facing roadblocks in his crusade against corrupt public servants, whistleblower Sanjiv Chaturvedi, an Indian Forest Service (IFoS) officer, has written to Prime Minister Manmohan Singh seeking action against certain PMO officials who were allegedly protecting powerful politicians and bureaucrats of the B S Hooda-led Haryana government by not sharing information under the transparency law.

Chaturvedi alleged that some PMO officials were concealing certain information directly and indirectly linked to the 'proposed' CBI probe into the multi-crore plantation scam in the state unearthed by him during his posting in Haryana in 2009.

The IFoS officer, posted as chief vigilance officer of AIIMS, had sought this information from the PMO under the RTI Act which, he claimed, would go a long way in fixing responsibility of politicians and bureaucrats in many cases of corruption in Haryana.

The specific information sought by him pertained to documents and file notings on meetings of officers of the ministries of personnel and environment that took place in the PMO on the issue of recommending a CBI inquiry into the plantation scam.

Unable to get the information, he went on to appeal before the first appellate authority under the transparency law. Though the authority in November last year directed the PMO to provide Chaturvedi the relevant information, he has not got the details.

In his letter to the PM on March 10, the Haryana-cadre IFoS officer of 2002 batch said, "This is a very unfortunate situation where officers of your own office are involved in blatant violation of one of the flagship legislations (RTI Act) of your tenure, which has always been projected by your good self as the most significant achievement of your government."

Without taking names of public servants, he alleged that the motive of these officers (of the PMO) appeared to be to somehow protect corrupt politicians and bureaucrats of Haryana government.

"However, in the process, these officers of your esteemed office have simply made a mockery of the RTI Act, 2005, for which, they should be properly punished," Chaturvedi said in his letter which he claimed to have written in his "private capacity as citizen of India".

Besides demanding inquiry against concerned PMO officials, Chaturvedi also forwarded his letter to the Central Vigilance Commission (CVC) seeking immediate protection for himself under the statutory provisions related to protection of whistleblowers.

Chaturvedi had exposed the scam while he was posted as divisional forest officer in Jhajjar in January 2009. He had detected that funds from international donor agencies were allegedly embezzled in the state in the name of plantation. He had blown the lid off the irregularities when he found that the plantation existed only on paper.

The ministry of environment and forests carried out an inquiry and termed it a fit case to probed by CBI. The ministry had in its inquiry in 2010 even named certain bureaucrats and politicians in Haryana as being involved in the scams and harassment of the whistleblower.

Chaturvedi had in November 2012 moved the Supreme Court to implement the ministry's inquiry report and order a CBI inquiry into the matter. The state government, however, recently filed a petition before the high court for quashing the inquiry report......................http://epaper.timesofindia.com/Repository/ml.asp?Ref=VE9JSi8yMDE0LzAzLzI2I0FyMDA3MDY=&Mode=Gif&Locale=english-skin-custom 

Tuesday, March 25, 2014

WMO .... There is not standstill in global warming ... a wake up callbefore the crucial WR-II report of the IPCC AR5

http://t.co/HkEoodEKOH

World weather body warns of extreme weather due to climate change
Vishwa Mohan,TNN | Mar 25, 2014, 06.52AM IST 
NEW DELHI: Just a week ahead of the release of a crucial report of a UN panel on impact of climate change on food, water and other resources, the World Meteorological Organisation on Monday set the tone for tackling the phenomena urgently and said, "There is no standstill in global warming".
Sounding a note of caution through example, it said "13 of the 14 warmest years" in recorded history fell in the current century.

The WMO, which made its findings public in its annual climate report in Geneva, also said 2013 was the sixth warmest year (tied with 2007) on record, indicating a long-term global warming trend.

"Each of the last three decades has been warmer than the previous one, culminating with 2001-10 as the warmest decade on record," it said debunking the skeptics' theory of a 'pause' in global warming.

The findings clearly show that effects of climate change are being felt everywhere - as reflected in many extreme weather events of 2013 ranging from Typhoon Haiyan in the Philipines, record hot Australian summer and heavy Monsoon rains and floods (like Uttarakhand disaster) and cyclone Phailin (in Odisha) in India.

The climate report assumes significance at the time when the UN's Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) is expected to predict many similar extreme weather events across the globe including one on the Himalayan glaciers. Unlike the 2007 report which wrongly projected that all Himalayan ice might melt by 2035, a leaked draft report of the panel mentioned that the IPCC would probably project that the Himalayan ice may "range from a 2% gain to a 29% loss by 2035" affecting the available fresh-water resources in India and China or affecting weather in this part of the globe.

The IPCC report - second part of its fifth report — is to be released in Tokyo on March 31. Scientists from across the globe have already assembled in Japan's capital to edit and finalize the report during their brainstorming from March 25 to 29.
Analyzing the extreme weather events of 2013, the WMO has also praised India for efforts in handling cyclone Phailin.

Its secretary-general, Michel Jarraud, said, "Weather forecasting, including of storms and other hazards, has become much more skilful in recent years. As demonstrated in October 2013 by cyclone Phailin, the second strongest tropical cyclone to strike India since modern records began, improved forecasting, combined with government action to build national resilience and provide shelters, greatly reduces the loss of life."

The report also highlighted other extreme events like increase of temperature in many parts of India last summer. It noted that Nagpur had recorded its "all-time high temperature" of 47.9 degree C on May 22 while Amritsar observed its highest ever temperature of 48 degree C on both May 23 and 24 last year.

Referring to all those events, Jarraud said many of the extreme events of 2013 were "consistent with what we would expect as a result of human-induced climate change" - a remark which substantiates what the IPCC had stated in the first part of the fifth report in September last year.

In a statement, he said warming of the oceans had accelerated. "More than 90% of the excess energy trapped by greenhouse gases is stored in the oceans. Levels of these greenhouse gases are at record levels, meaning that our atmosphere and oceans will continue to warm for centuries to come. The laws of physics are non-negotiable," said the WMO secretary-general...............http://epaper.timesofindia.com/Repository/ml.asp?Ref=VE9JTS8yMDE0LzAzLzI2I0FyMDIzMDE=&Mode=Gif&Locale=english-skin-custom 

Sunday, March 23, 2014

World Water Day - March 22 ....Make water conservation a national obsession

http://t.co/2utwukCYfi

World Water Day: UN report predicts grim scenario for India; experts pitch for making water conservation a national obsession
Vishwa Mohan,TNN | Mar 22, 2014, 10.28PM IST 
NEW DELHI: As the world is already staring at impending water crisis due to climate change, population increase and pollution, a UN report has predicted that as many as 3.4 billion people will be living in "water-scarce" countries by 2025.

It also pointed out that the situation will be deteriorated further in the next 25 years (by 2050), culminating into instances of human conflicts in many parts of the globe.

The report, published on the eve of the World Water Day on Friday, indicated that the Indian sub-continent may face the brunt of the crisis where India would be at the Centre of this conflict due to its unique geographical position in South Asia.

Though the report has not specifically mentioned about the possibility of country-wise conflict, it identified river basins in the region which may pit India against Pakistan, China and Bangladesh over the issue of water sharing by 2050.

The report, which factored in scientific data and findings of various research institutions, said that Asia will be the biggest hotspot for bust-ups over water extraction, where water sources straddle national borders.

It said, "Areas of conflict include the Aral Sea and the Ganges-Brahmaputra River, Indus River and Mekong River basins".

Obviously, the Ganges-Brahmaputra and Indus River basins are crucial for India, Pakistan, Bangladesh and China (upper Brahmaputra) as far as distribution and sharing of water resources among these countries are concerned.

Facts, shared by India's ministry of water resources, have already painted a grim picture for the country which has 18% of the world's population with only 4% of the total usable water resources. Official data show that the annual per capita availability of water has already been decreased in the past 10 years (from 1,816 cubic meter in the year 2001 to 1,545 cubic meter in 2011).

As the country is heading for acute shortage when annual per capital availability of water will further reduce to 1,140 cubic meter by the year 2050, experts on the occasion of the World Water Day on Saturday called for urgent action to deal with it.

Environmentalist, Sunita Narain, said the country has to quickly resort to three-pronged strategy to handle the situation. "Hold water where it falls", she said while emphasizing on rain-water harvesting as the basic and most urgent action.

Enlisting these strategies, Narain, director general of the Delhi-based policy group, Centre for Science and Environment (CSE), said, "We can deal with the situation by water recharging through decentralized manner across the country, handling water pollution through effective measures and making water conservation a national obsession".

Many public and private organizations and research institutions, including the Indian Agriculture Research Institute (IARI) and International Water Management Institute (IWMI), too came out with many suggestions to save India from impending crisis.

They pitched for better use of technology in agriculture sector which is the biggest user of water followed by domestic and industrial sector. Institutions also called for several major policy decisions including rational water pricing, reducing water footprints and effective national legal framework for water governance.

Key points which may highlight the water availability position:

Global scenario

* More than 40% of the world's population will be living in areas of "severe" water stress by 2050

* Pressure on fresh water resources will see human conflict in many parts of the world

* Areas of conflict include Ganges-Brahmaputra River, Indus River and Mekong River basins

* 768 million people, at present, lack access to a safe and reliable source of water

* About 20% of the world's aquifers today are depleted

* Agriculture accounts for more than two-thirds of water use

India

* India has 18% of the world's population; It has 4% of water resources of the world

*annual per capita availability of water decreases from 6,042 cubic meter in the year 1947 to 1,545 cubic meter in 2011

* annual per capita availability of water was 1,816 cubic meter in 2001

* annual per capital availability of water will further reduce to 1,340 cubic meter by 2025 and to 1,140 cubic meter by the year 2050

* average annual potential of 'utilizable' quantity of water in the country -- 1,121 Billion Cubic Meter (BCM)

(surface water - 690 BCM)

(ground water - 431 BCM)

* estimated annual requirement of water by the year 2050 - 1,180 BCM (1 cubic meter = 1000 liters)

* 90% of waste water discharged in rivers does not meet environmental norms

* 65% rainwater runoff goes into the sea, which is a major wastage

* agriculture sector is the biggest users of water followed by domestic sector and industrial sector

(Sources: Reports of India's ministry of water resources, UN, World Bank, UNICEF and CSE)..................................http://epaper.timesofindia.com/Repository/ml.asp?Ref=Q0FQLzIwMTQvMDMvMjMjQXIwMjIwMw==&Mode=Gif&Locale=english-skin-custom

Saturday, March 22, 2014

Is it a beginning of a long process before government allows genetically modified (GM) food crops for commercial release based on scientific trials' findings?

http://t.co/tU984oUkM1

Govt regulator paves way for field trials of GM food crops including wheat, rice and maize
Vishwa Mohan,TNN | Mar 21, 2014, 09.25PM IST 

Companies like Monsanto, Mahyco and BASF whose applications got revalidation will, however, be able to go for field trials only after getting state's mandatory nod.
NEW DELHI: Taking a major step forward to scientifically assess 'risk' and 'safety' aspects of transgenic crops, the government's top regulator — Genetic Engineering Appraisal Committee (GEAC) — on Friday revalidated 10 varieties of GM crops including wheat, rice, maize and cotton and allowed multi-national seed companies to go for "confined field trials" of these varieties.

Companies like Monsanto, Mahyco and BASF whose applications got revalidation will, however, be able to go for field trials only after getting the state's mandatory nod.

Revalidation of these varieties was required as their "validity period" lapsed due to state government's stand of not allowing them to go for field trial. The GEAC had given its clearance in those 10 cases way back in 2011 and 2012.

The committee, which met under the chairmanship of additional secretary in the ministry of environment and forests (MoEF) Hem Pande, however, did not take decision on any new cases in its meeting on Friday. It will meet again on April 25 to take a call on the fate of 70 fresh applications.

The revalidation of 10 cases on Friday would allow the seed companies, which developed these varieties, to go for "confined field trials" (called Phase-II trial) in bigger area as compared to their tests in a very small tract of land during Phase-I.

The move comes barely a month after the ministry had given its nod to "confined field trials" of over 200 transgenic varieties of GM crops which got GEAC's clearance in its 117th meeting in March last year.

Though the regulatory body had given its go ahead to those 200 varieties, the then environment minister Jayanthi Natarajan had kept this in abeyance. The ministry had then felt that the companies should not be allowed to go for field trials unless the Supreme Court takes a final view on a pending PIL on the contentious issue of GM crops.

The MoEF had, however, under the present minister M Veerappa Moily, last month allowed the GEAC to hold its 118th meeting on Friday, taking in view demands of scientist community from across the country.

Agriculture scientists from research institutions including IARI, ICAR and various Universities have been demanding "field trials" for GM crops for long, arguing that "confined field trials are essential for the evaluation of productivity performance as well as food and environmental safety assessment".

A group of prominent scientists had met under 'father of green revolution' MS Swaminathan here at National Academy of Agricultural Sciences (NASA) in February and issued a 15-point resolution in favour of GM crops.

Pitching for the field trials, the resolution said, "The non-conductance of regular field trials is a handicap as well as disincentive in harnessing the benefits of a wide array of transgenic material available with different research organizations".

Anti-GM activists have, however, taken strong objection to the GEAC's decision on Friday to revalidate those 10 cases of transgenic varieties which will pave the way for their field trials.

Protesting field trials, convenor of Coalition for GM Free India, Rajesh Krishnan said, "The bio-safety tests can be done in a greenhouse or glass house. The field trials are mostly for agronomic purposes. The industry wants to reduce the period of regulation and hence wants to run these things simultaneously".

He said, "It is, in fact, ridiculous to simultaneously do assessment of risks and open up the experiment for contamination, which often happens in the case of a field trial, before the risk assessment is done".

The coalition as well as Greenpeace India had also requested the ministry not to take any decision on field trials of GM crops unless the Supreme Court takes its final call on the matter. The apex court is scheduled to hear the matter on April 14.

The industry body — Association of Biotech Led Enterprises- Agriculture Group (ABLE-AG) — has, however, welcomed the GEAC's move, calling it "a progressive push to the march of GM technology in India".

"We welcome this and hope that the rest of the applications too shall be expeditiously cleared," said Ram Kaundinya, chairman of the ABLE-AG...........................http://epaper.timesofindia.com/Repository/ml.asp?Ref=Q0FQLzIwMTQvMDMvMjIjQXIwMDMwNg==&Mode=Gif&Locale=english-skin-custom

Thursday, March 20, 2014

Fresh draft notification on Western Ghats ESA

http://t.co/0A3Vbnhdy3

Ministry of environment and forest brings out fresh draft notification on eco-sensitive area in Western Ghats
Vishwa Mohan,TNN | Mar 18, 2014, 08.30PM IST 
NEW DELHI: Days after getting Election Commission's nod, the Centre on Tuesday brought out the 'draft' notification on Western Ghats reducing the originally earmarked Ecologically Sensitive Area (ESA) by 3,115sqkm.

The reduction — from existing 59,940sqkm to 56,825sqkm — is mainly due to the cutting down of the Keral'a ESA. The ministry of environment and forest had reduced the area following the state's strong protest against the Centre's previous order.

The ESA — spreading over six states including Gujarat, Maharashtra, Goa, Karnataka, Tamil Nadu and Kerala — is meant for making the earmarked zone a 'no-go area' for high polluting human activities like mining, quarrying, big constructions and setting up industries.

A gazette notification can, however, be made effective only by the new government at Centre. Under the Election Commission's direction, the ministry of environment and forest (MoEF) cannot come out with the 'final' notification till the Parliamentary elections are over.

The MoEF, in the meantime, will get the stakeholders' (including villagers) objections or suggestions on the draft notification during the next 60 days, beginning Tuesday.

The intervening two-month period before the 'final' notification, incorporating those suggestions, will not affect local population in Kerala or any of the remaining five states as the ESA order does not prohibit agriculture, plantation and human settlements in the earmarked villages in Western Ghats.

The draft notification carries list of villages and their detailed area maps within the ESA spreading over six states. It also has annexure identifying the industries (Red category) and big constructions which are completely prohibited within the protected zones.

Such banned industries and constructions include the 85 types of high polluting activities including setting up aluminum smelter, cement plant, fertilizer factory, glass manufacturing units, zinc smelter, automobile manufacturing units, airports and hotels (having 100 rooms and above).

Under the draft notification, setting up hydropower plants will not be banned. Such plants will, however, be set up after getting required environmental clearance. The MoEF, through its draft note changing its previous orders on Western Ghats, has made it clear that "the provisions in this notification shall be subject to the final orders of the court in pending litigation".

An office memorandum, issued on March 4, had made it clear that recommendation of other state governments in the Western Ghats will also be considered by the ministry if they undertake the Kerala-like exercise of demarcating the ESA by physical verification and submit the proposal to the ministry "within 60 days of issuance of the draft notification".

Kerala had been opposed to the ministry's earlier order saying it would affect livelihood of local population. It had pointed out that while in other states in Western Ghats, only a portion of natural landscape has been recommended as ESA by the High Level Working Group (HLWG), in Kerala the ESA (13,108sqkm) was more than the area of natural landscape (12,477sqkm).

Keeping this in mind, the Centre has now reduced the ESA in Kerala from 13,108sqkm to 9,993.7sqkm.

Draft Notification: 


http://t.co/ybCEgwZshF

Status of ESA in states:

* Karnataka- 20,668sqkm

* Maharashtra- 17,340sqkm

* Kerala- 9,993sqkm

* Tamil Nadu- 6,914sqkm

* Goa- 1,461sqkm

* Gujarat- 449sqkm

* Original ESA (spreading over six states)- 59,940sqkm

* Total ESA under fresh draft notification- 56,825sqkm

* Reduction- 3,115sqkm 


http://epaper.timesofindia.com/Repository/ml.asp?Ref=VE9JS1JLTy8yMDE0LzAzLzE5I0FyMDAxMDY=&Mode=Gif&Locale=english-skin-custom

Will mainstream political parties bat for scientists in their poll manifestos?

http://t.co/ryA4UxpqOC

Scientists bring a 15-point resolution in favour of GM crop technology
Vishwa Mohan,TNN | Mar 13, 2014, 09.29PM IST 
NEW DELHI: As political parties are fine-tuning their elections manifestos, a group of country's leading agricultural scientists have come out with their suggestions in the form of a 15-point resolution which may help the new government in bringing food security in India and achieving a "zero hunger challenge" of the United Nations by 2025.

The group has sought to get "political support" in favour of GM technology which, it believes, an important "tool to improve agricultural crops for their nutritional value, water use efficiency and productivity".

Though the resolution was adopted by the scientists under the chairmanship of the father of Green Revolution in India, M S Swaminathan, here in early February, the group has brought it in public domain only last week. The scientists, including experts from ICAR, IARI and other government institutions, have felt the need to bring out the resolution in public domain as they don't want to be left out at the time when anti-GM crop groups had already articulated their points of views to politicians and impressed upon the main opposition BJP.

The resolution was made public by the ICAR director general S Ayyappan at National Academy of Agriculture Sciences (NAAS) here last week.

Besides highlighting importance of transgenic crops in bringing food security, the resolution also sought a key role for the ICAR in the "commercial release of the GM crops to prevent undue proliferation of a large number of (transgenic) hybrids\varieties".

Pitching for the use of GM crops, the resolution carried certain dos and don'ts for the use of transgenic varieties and sought to strengthen the national regulatory system under an autonomous National Biotechnology Regulatory Authority.

Amid apprehensions that the change of regime at Centre may dilute the recent position taken by the government in favour of GM crops, these scientists now want all the political parties to look at their resolution before taking their call on the issue.

"We cannot meet the leaders from political parties on our own at this juncture. Though we have shared our point of view with the policy makers within the government, we wish the opposition parties understand the issue by going through our resolution which is now in public domain", said a senior scientist.

Indication from the BJP manifesto committee chief Murli Manohar Joshi that his party may not favour GM crops is the main reason for the scientists' worry. They fear that the party, if comes to power, would possibly reverse the recent decision taken by the Union environment minister M Veerappa Moily who had allowed field trials of over 200 transgenic varieties of the genetically engineered crops.

Joshi's point of view is learnt to be made public by the farmers and NGOs' representatives who had met him last week. Besides expressing their strong opposition to GM crops, they also demanded that the BJP-led NDA should set up an integrated commission, if it comes to power, to deal with all issues related to farmers.

Strict law is needed to regulate affairs of Circuses in India

http://t.co/A39jtVH1PN

Circuses face show cause notices following reports of cruelties against animals
Vishwa Mohan,TNN | Mar 11, 2014, 08.47PM IST 
NEW DELHI: Acting on reports of cruelties against animals in circuses, the Animal Welfare Board of India and the Central Zoo Authority have issued show cause notices to all registered circus owners across the country asking them to quickly be on board in stopping such practices or face action including withdrawing the recognition of circuses.

Both these central agencies have warned the circus owners that if they don't respond to these notices and adhere to the rules, their recognition as entities having 'captive animal facility' will be withdrawn within 30 days. If de-recognition happens, it will make the circuses illegal establishments and they won't be able to keep the custody of any wild animals, such as elephants.

The central agencies have taken note of the findings of the People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA) India which had in its field investigation of circuses from November 2012 to July 2013 found a number of violations. Its findings included rampant use of weapons; death of animals due to inadequate care; drunken circus staff who were handling animals; nearly constant chaining and caging and other severe confinement of elephants, dogs, cats, birds and other animals.

The PETA investigation had also found instances where animals showed signs of severe psychological distress, including constant swaying, circling and even self-biting. It also highlighted how the circuses did use elephants and other animals that were nearly blind or had severe eye problems.

The organization, meanwhile, wrote to the ministry of environment and forest, asking for ban on the use of animals in circuses like what countries like Cyprus, Bolivia, Greece, Bosnia and Herzegovina have done long ago. It also highlighted the alleged violations on the part of the popular Moonlight Circus in Goa where instances of cruelties had been reported recently.

Poorva Joshipura of PETA India said, "Had the government followed the lead of numerous other nations by banning the archaic and cruel use of animals in circuses, the recent atrocity of the animals being left hungry by the Moonlight Circus and so many others cruelties could have been prevented."

Inspection of animals at the Moonlight circus last week had shown that the animals including Elephants hadn't been fed properly for many days.

Seeking complete ban on the use of animals in circuses, the PETA also requested the ministry to treat the Moonlight Circus incident as a wake-up call.

Referring to the PETA's findings, the Animal Welfare Board of India had last year decided to stop performance of all the "injured and aged animals" in the circuses. It had also asked circus owners to make arrangement for rehabilitation of these animals with some of the animal welfare organizations and Zoos.

The Board had, in its annual general body meeting in August last year, had also, in principle, decided to stop registration of elephants for performance under Performing Animals Rules in view of cruelties and abuse suffered by them. It had also supported for a ban on the use of animals in circuses. But the government has, so far, not taken the final call..................http://epaper.timesofindia.com/Repository/ml.asp?Ref=Q0FQLzIwMTQvMDMvMTIjQXIwMTcwMQ==&Mode=Gif&Locale=english-skin-custom

Politics scores over environmental concerns in Western Ghats ... New Office Memorandum

http://t.co/rvipoSnvV7

Centre reduces Kerala eco-sensitive area by over 3,100sqkm hours before poll date announcement
Vishwa Mohan,TNN | Mar 5, 2014, 09.51AM IST 

The order banned all polluting activities like mining, quarrying, setting up industries and medium and big construction within the ESA. 
NEW DELHI: Accepting the demand of state government merely hours before Lok Sabha poll schedule is to be announcement on Wednesday, the Centre reduced the Kerala's ecologically sensitive area by about 3115sqkm.

The office memorandum to this effect, made public by the ministry of environment and forest (MoEF) on early Wednesday morning, shows that the government now earmarked 9,993.7sqkm in Kerala as ecologically sensitive area (ESA) as against the earlier order which marked 13,108sqkm area in the state as protected zone.

The order banned all polluting activities like mining, quarrying, setting up industries and medium and big construction within the ESA. Agricultural land, plantations and habitations will, however, be kept out of the ESA.

Kerala had been opposed to the MoEF earlier order saying it would affect livelihood of local population within the ESA. It had pointed out that while in other states in Western Ghats, only a portion of natural landscape has been recommended as ESA by the High Level Working Group (HLWG), in Kerala the ESA (13,108sqkm) is more than the area of natural landscape (12,477sqkm).

The expert committee constituted by the state government as also the Panchayat level Committees have recommended exclusion of cultural landscape (habitation - human settlement) from ESA as identified by the HLWG based on physical verification.

Keeping this in mind, the Centre has now reduced the ESA in Kerala from 13,108sqkm to 9,993.7sqkm.

The fresh office memorandum to this effect, issued on late Tuesday night but made public on early Wednesday morning says, "As the village-wise details of ESA proposed by the state government are available with the Kerala state biodiversity board, the stakeholders may access the same from their website while sending objections or suggestions on the draft notification".

The office memorandum made it clear that recommendation of other state governments in the Western Ghats— Gujarat, Maharashtra, Goa, Karnataka and Tamil Nadu— will also be considered by the ministry if they undertake the exercise of demarcating ESA by physical verification and submit the proposal to the MoEF.

It now appears that the other states will have to wait for the new government at Centre to take decision on their respective ESAs within the Western Ghats.

The HLWG had earmarked around 60,000sqkm areas within Western Ghats— comprising six states— as the ESA last year, banning most of the human activities like mining, quarrying, industries and construction within the zone to protect the ecosystem and biodiversity of the region.

Read the complete memorandum



http://epaper.timesofindia.com/Repository/ml.asp?Ref=Q0FQLzIwMTQvMDMvMDYjQXIwMTMwMg==&Mode=Gif&Locale=english-skin-custom

Indian scientists turn to Royal Society of London for guidance on communication tools

http://t.co/LzKfyc8KEI

Indian scientists want to educate politicians on benefits of GM crops
Vishwa Mohan,TNN | Mar 4, 2014, 10.15PM IST 
NEW DELHI: Amid heat of intense campaign by civil societies against GM crops in India, agriculture scientists from premier institutions on Tuesday decided to counter them with "scientific facts" and use different information tools to create awareness among "politicians" by adopting a method applied by the Royal Society of London.

Taking a leaf out of the Royal Society's book to reach out to people through regular interactions at different levels within and outside the government, the National Academy of Agriculture Sciences (NAAS) will set up two committees for this purpose.

"A committee on 'public understanding' of science and another on 'political understanding' of science will work to remove doubts from the minds of general public who have virtually become a victim of misinformation campaign of anti-GM crop groups in India", said K C Bansal, director of the National Bureau of Plant Genetic Resources.

Bansal along with many other scientists of the Indian Agriculture Research Institute (IARI) and other premier institutions was part of the meeting which adopted a resolution to this effect last month. The meeting on "GM Crops for Nutritional Security" was held under the chairmanship of the eminent agriculture scientist M S Swaminathan.

Sensing that the scientific community would not be able to succeed in their mission unless politicians and common mass get clarity on the contentious issues, the resolution also sought to create a "pan-political support base" for promoting genetic engineering research in the country through sustained 'awareness' drives.

Releasing a copy of the resolution, director general of Indian Council of Agriculture Research (ICAR), S Ayyappan said, "There is an urgent need to tell people the benefit of transgenic crops and biotechnology. It will be a tool not only to increase productivity but also nutritional value".

Flanked by IARI's head of genetics division K V Prabhu, Ayyappan expressed his pleasure over the environment minister M Veerappa Moily's recent decision to give a go ahead to field trials of all those transgenic varieties of GM crops which had been cleared by the government's regulatory body - Genetic Engineering Appraisal Committee (GEAC) - in March, 2013.

Ayyappan also appealed the fellow scientists to "communicate with public and policy-makers about the safety and benefits of GM crop products and remove the undue fears and apprehensions about transgenic crop adoption".

The scientists, incidentally, made public their resolution the day when activists from a number of anti-GM groups, including Greenpeace and Coalition for a GM Free India, unfurled a banner of protest at environment ministry building highlighting the message "Moily Selling the Nation".

The activists claimed that the decision to permit field trials has been getting flak from various quarters. "Various farmer unions as well as political parties like AAP, JD (U) and PMK have condemned this action. The Kerala agriculture minister also declared that the state will not permit any field trials of GM crops", said a statement issued by Greenpeace India.

They highlighted that the governments of Bihar, Madhya Pradesh, Chattisgarh, West Bengal, Rajasthan and Tamilnadu had earlier denied permissions for GM field trials in their respective states.



Tuesday, March 4, 2014

India's biotech strategy holds key to development of this sector ...National Biotechnology Development Strategy, 2014

http://t.co/iSMVFRkBaI

Draft biotechnology strategy documents highlights importance of GM crops
Vishwa Mohan,TNN | Mar 4, 2014, 12.57AM IST 
NEW DELHI: With agriculture and environment ministries finally coming on the same page to promote GM crops if they pass bio-safety standards through field trials, the ministry of science on Monday came out with its draft national biotechnology development strategy, 2014, suggesting a road map to that end.

The department of biotechnology's revised strategy of 'Vision 2020' highlighted how the GM crops would help achieve "higher productivity and better quality food while reducing resource inputs".

The move may help both agriculture and environment ministries in fine-tuning their joint response to the Supreme Court which will begin its regular hearing on the contentious issue of moratorium on field trials of genetically-engineered crops next month.

The department in its 'Biotech Strategy-II' pitched for a world class regulatory system which can build confidence among the civil society, farmers, consumers and scientific community.

Though the same suggestion had come in its first strategic document (Strategy-I) in 2007 when it asked for setting up a Biotechnology Regulatory Authority of India (BRAI), the bill is still pending with a parliamentary panel. The 2014 document has once again recommended it.

Making the draft document public, the department on Monday sought "comments" from stakeholders including farmers, scientists and civil society by March 10.

"A final document is likely to be prepared taking in view those comments before the apex court begins its hearing on the GM crop issues next month," said an official.

Biotech Strategy-II comes at a time when the government has moved towards field trials of selected varieties of GM crops. Although the agriculture ministry had always been in favour of such trials, the environment ministry under Jayanthi Natarajan took an opposite view.

Under Veerappa Moily, the ministry reversed its stand and gave nod last week for field trials of all those transgenic varieties of GM crops which had been cleared by the Genetic Engineering Appraisal Committee (GEAC) - regulatory body for genetically engineered crops - in its last meeting in March, 2013.

The draft has suggested improvement in the existing regulatory system, seeking to make the GEAC "scientifically strong, professionally competent, conflict-free, transparent and backed by sound validation infrastructure" - an advice which may go a long way in dealing with loopholes of the present system which has been resisted by civil society for long.

The department also recommended setting up a toxicological centre to "generate toxicity, safety data for biological and chemical contaminants and adulterants along with GM foods and traditionally used herbs".

The department has also sought to establish India a world class bio-manufacturing hub for developed and developing markets. The vision document deals with matters relating to human health, marine biotech, aquaculture, food and nutritional security, industry biotechnology, bioinformatics, clean energy and environment.

"Strategy-II is the direct result of formal and informal consultations over the past two years with over 300 stakeholders including scientists, educators, policy-makers, leaders of industry, NGOs and international experts," said the department.

Monday, March 3, 2014

Great Backyard Bird Count (GBBC) .... Indian bird-watchers arrive at the scene in a big way

http://t.co/RqweU9LV87

India reports largest number of bird species
Vishwa Mohan,TNN | Mar 3, 2014, 02.01AM IST 

Bird watchers from all seven continents had last year reported and documented 4,258 species from about 180 bird families. 
NEW DELHI: India is home to the largest number of bird species in the world. Preliminary findings of a recent global event — Great Backyard Bird Count — have put India on top of the list of 127 countries which sent their entries through pictures and videos.

Final results of the four-day Great Backyard Bird Count (GBBC), held between February 14 and 17, are yet to be announced but the data analyzed and updated till February 28 shows that the final order may not change India's position.

A US newspaper, The Kansas City Star, flagged the preliminary findings of the global bird count first on February 22.

In its report, 'Want to see a wide variety of birds? Head to India', the daily said, "India's emergence as a bird-watching hot spot underscores the rising worldwide popularity of the pastime." It put India on top with 765 species. The US came second with 637 species (till February 22).

Latest updates, checked by TOI on Sunday, however, showed that though the US slipped to third spot a week after the American daily first flagged the preliminary results, India continues to maintain its lead.

The GBBC is jointly organized by the Cornell Lab of Ornithology, the National Audubon Society and the Bird Studies Canada. Though the US and Canada have been participating in the event since 1998, the first ever such 'global' bird count was organized in 2013 when participants from 110 countries sent their entries during February 15-18 last year.

Bird watchers from all seven continents had last year reported and documented 4,258 species from about 180 bird families. Mexico had topped the 2013 GBBC list with 645 species followed by the US (638), India (544), Costa Rica (508), Colombia (424), Australia (383), Panama (371) and Peru (325).

The second version of the global bird count, updated till February 28, however, showed that participants from 127 counties this time found 4,296 species with India reporting the highest number of 819 species followed by Mexico (683), USA (644), Costa Rica (609), Australia (501), Colombia (397), Panama (278) and Peru (138).

The event was launched in 1998 as the first online citizen-science project to collect data on wild birds and to display results in near real-time. Participants during the event period send snapshots of birds as their entries which are subsequently analyzed and documented by the organizers before displaying final results of the GBBC.

The participants will unite once again next year during February 13-16 to see how many of the world's 10,240 bird species can be found.................http://epaper.timesofindia.com/Repository/ml.asp?Ref=VE9JS00vMjAxNC8wMy8wMyNBcjAxMTAx&Mode=Gif&Locale=english-skin-custom

Bollywood film-maker Mahesh Bhatt on GM crops.....anti-GM groups must be pleased with what this celebrity did for their cause

http://t.co/E9erMfgXDt

Filmmaker Mahesh Bhatt calls Veerappa Moily a 'corporate mole'
Vishwa Mohan,TNN | Mar 1, 2014, 04.11PM IST 

Filmmaker Mahesh Bhatt said the government should be sued if GM crops contaminate our crops.
NEW DELHI: Bollywood film-maker Mahesh Bhatt has called the Union environment and forest minister M Veerappa Moily a "corporate mole".

A day after Moily reversed the decision of his predecessor Jayanthi Natarajan on GM crops and allowed field trials of over 200 varieties of genetically modified seeds, Bhatt on Friday questioned the minister's decision on Twitter.

Bhatt tweeted: "Moily is a corporate mole, (he) must explain why India needs GM crops when it produces over 260 million tonnes of food grains."

Expressing his views against genetically engineered food crops, Bhatt said, "The government should be sued if GM crops contaminate our crops. Wake up consumers, once GM crops are out in open they can't be withdrawn!."

The filmmaker, known for his anti-GM crop stand, also took on multi-national seed companies for their ongoing attempts to eventually make production of transgenic food crop a reality in India in future at the cost of human health.

Bhatt tweeted, "In their hunger for profit, corporations turn science against the human race."

His reaction came after Moily's move which allowed seed companies and agriculture research institutes in India to go ahead with scientific filed trials of different transgenic varieties of GM crops which had got clearance from the government's regulatory body - Genetic Engineering Appraisal Committee (GEAC) - in March last year.

The decision, which had been kept in abeyance by Moily's predecessor Jayanthi Natarajan, will allow the companies and institutions to put more than 200 transgenic varieties of rice, wheat, maize, castor and cotton on filed trials to check their suitability for commercial production in future.

Though Moily had on Thursday emphasized that the decision would not in any way violate the Supreme Court's order in this matter and these companies (both government and private) and research institutions can go for trial only after getting nod from respective state governments, his clarification did not convince the anti-GM crop groups in the country.

The Greenpeace has asked Moily to explain on what grounds he has allowed the field trials for GMOs (genetically modified organisms).

"The environment minister has the moral obligation to explain to the citizens of this country what has changed since his predecessors took proactive positions to save our food. Various stakeholders including the parliamentary standing committee (PSC), technical expert committee (TEC) of the Supreme Court have pointed out shortcomings of the GEAC. The minister should further explain why a hasty decision of clearing field trials was taken while the Supreme Court decision is pending on the matter," said Neha Saigal, campaigner, Greenpeace India....................http://epaper.timesofindia.com/Repository/ml.asp?Ref=VE9JS00vMjAxNC8wMy8wMiNBcjAwOTAy&Mode=Gif&Locale=english-skin-custom

Politicians can give you best world view if they are not worried of votes ... Abdullah makes sense while speaking his mind at CSE function

http://t.co/TjnWRM3LAZ

Farooq Abdullah: Free electricity is like cocaine
Vishwa Mohan,TNN | Mar 1, 2014, 04.15AM IST 

"The country has to stop giving electricity for free. It is like giving them cocaine. Once people get addicted to it, you cannot stop it," Farooq Abdullah said.
NEW DELHI: At a time when power subsidy has become a topic of intense debate in Delhi and elsewhere ahead of the general elections, minister of new and renewable energy Farooq Abdullah on Friday pitched for stopping the practice of "free electricity" to people and said it was akin to giving them cocaine.

Abdullah said, "The country has to stop giving electricity for free. It is like giving them cocaine. Once people get addicted to it, you cannot stop it. After every five years (election time), you have to just double the dose of cocaine (to fulfill their desire)."

The minister used this analogy while speaking at the occasion of releasing a citizen's report on the 'State of Renewable Energy in India'. The report was prepared by Delhi-based policy group Centre for Science and Environment (CSE).

Releasing the 198-page report on the concluding day of the fourth 'Anil Agarwal Dialogue on Energy Access and Renewable Energy', Abdullah underlined the crucial role that renewable energy will play in ensuring a lesser import dependence.

Advising all the stakeholders including industries to play a pro-active role, he said, "Renewable energy is not only the future of India but it's a future of the World. Industry will need to innovate while the banks would need to reduce interest rates to promote green energy".

The CSE's report too emphasizes on green energy use, saying in a situation where 50 crore people have access to less than six hours of electricity every day and 70 crore people do not have access to clean cooking fuel, the renewable energy is the only solution.

CSE chief Sunita Narain said, "We need to understand how to mainstream clean energy and energy access across the country. Decentralized renewable energy systems could offer the key to solving this state of energy poverty".

She said though the importance of renewable energy and efforts to make it a key component of India's electricity need has come to the centre stage under Abdullah, the government needs to do more to bring the benefit to every individual.

The citizen's report on 'State of Renewable Energy in India' looks at the current status of renewable energy in the country, as well as the issues that plague the sector. It also puts together the policy interventions in solar, wind, small hydro, bio-mass and waste-to-energy sectors.

It, at the same time, also pointed out that renewable energy projects can have major ecological impacts if they are installed without proper environmental assessment and management. Chandra Bhushan, head of CSE's renewable energy team, said, "Renewable energy must benefit the local community — citizens must have the first right over electricity from renewable sources and they must benefit from the installation of renewable energy on their land."......................http://epaper.timesofindia.com/Repository/ml.asp?Ref=VE9JS00vMjAxNC8wMy8wMSNBcjAwODA0&Mode=Gif&Locale=english-skin-custom

fate of GM food crops in India ..... ball is now in Supreme Court for the next set of applications

http://t.co/AXXyPu2eSS

Veerappa Moily okays field trials of GM crops
Vishwa Mohan,TNN | Feb 28, 2014, 05.20AM IST 
NEW DELHI: Seed companies and agriculture research institutes can go ahead with scientific field trials of different transgenic varieties of GM crops which had got clearance from the government's regulatory body Genetic Engineering Appraisal Committee (GEAC) in March last year.

A day after agriculture minister Sharad Pawar spelt out the government's stand over the contentious issue while pitching for field trials, environment minister M Veerappa Moily on Thursday gave his go-ahead to the move.

Moily said he had cleared the file as the GEAC's decision was not bound by the Supreme Court's moratorium (on field trials) order.

The decision, which had been kept in abeyance by his predecessor Jayanthi Natarajan, will now allow companies and institutions to put more than 200 transgenic varieties of rice, wheat, maize, castor and cotton on field trials to check their suitability for commercial production.

Moily emphasized that these companies (both government and private) and research institutions can, however, go for trial only after getting nod from respective state governments.

"If a particular state government does not allow it, these entities will not be able to go for field trial," environment secretary V Rajagopalan said.

It is learnt that some states like Punjab, Haryana, Maharashtra and Gujarat do not have any problem in allowing field trials. At present, government allows commercial production of only Bt cotton (transgenic variety of cotton). Though Bt brinjal had passed its field trial, it was not allowed to go for commercial production amid strong protests by civil society groups.

The government has, meanwhile, called the next meeting of GEAC on March 21 to decide other pending applications.

Though the GEAC in its last meeting on March 22 last year had given approval for field trials of these 200—odd varieties of food and non—food crops, the then environment minister had decided to keep it in abeyance until strict regulatory mechanism and bio safety protection regime were put in place in the country.

Both anti— and pro—GM crop groups, meanwhile, crossed swords over Moily's move to reverse his predecessor's decision. Reacting over the move, AAP leader and senior Supreme Court lawyer Prashant Bhushan said the decision was a clear violation of the apex court's order.

While the Coalition for a GM Free India and Greenpeace condemned the Moily's action as "unscientific, anti-people and reeking of vested interests", industry body Association of Biotech Led Enterprises—Agriculture Group (ABLE—AG) welcomed the removal of restrictions on previously approved field trials of genetically modified crops.

"The writing on the wall is clear now. The UPA government is against the interest of the citizens, our farmers and the welfare of the nation. It is hand in glove with the multi—national GM seed industry that stands to gain immensely from the numerous open field trials of GM crops," said Rajesh Krishnan, convener, Coalition for a GM Free India.

Greenpeace was equally critical of Moily's decision. Its campaigner Neha Saigal said, "This proves that the government has turned a blind eye to the growing scientific evidence on the adverse impacts of GM crops and the massive opposition to GM crops from around the country. The government has clearly chosen corporate interests over the interests of the people."

ABLE-AG executive director N Seetharama, on the other hand, lauded Moily's decision. He said, "At a time when agriculture is under severe stress and requires immediate infusion of technology and innovation, we can't afford to ignore biotechnology which has a proven track record of enhancing crop yields in a safe and sustainable way the world over."......................http://epaper.timesofindia.com/Repository/ml.asp?Ref=VE9JS00vMjAxNC8wMi8yOCNBcjAwOTAw&Mode=Gif&Locale=english-skin-custom