Interlocutors too want Act withdrawn
Vishwa Mohan |TNN | Nov 12, 2011, 05.02AM IST
NEW DELHI: Jammu and Kashmir CM Omar Abdullah's views on the Armed Forces Special Powers Act tally with what the central interlocutors for the state have said in their report to the Union home minister P Chidambaram.
The report, which is yet to be made public by the Centre, is learnt to have favoured de-notification of the Disturbed Areas Act from certain 'peaceful' districts leading to automatic withdrawal of the AFSPA. It has stated that areas can again be 'notified' as Disturbed Areas as and when it is needed after security review, and therefore the 'idea' of withdrawal should be experimented at this juncture.
Pitching for 'partial' withdrawal of the Act, the chapter - dealing with the controversial law - has cited wishes of the people of the state, though it noted 'reservations' expressed by the Army against the 'withdrawal'.
Without disclosing contents of the report, Dileep Padgaonkar, who headed the three-member team of interlocutors, on Friday said he personally felt that the Disturbed Areas Act should be de-notified in certain districts that had not witnessed violence in the past six months or so. Government can periodically review the situation, and call the Army again if needed, he added.........http://epaper.timesofindia.com/Repository/ml.asp?Ref=Q0FQLzIwMTEvMTEvMTIjQXIwMTgwMg==&Mode=Gif&Locale=english-skin-custom
Vishwa Mohan |TNN | Nov 12, 2011, 05.02AM IST
NEW DELHI: Jammu and Kashmir CM Omar Abdullah's views on the Armed Forces Special Powers Act tally with what the central interlocutors for the state have said in their report to the Union home minister P Chidambaram.
The report, which is yet to be made public by the Centre, is learnt to have favoured de-notification of the Disturbed Areas Act from certain 'peaceful' districts leading to automatic withdrawal of the AFSPA. It has stated that areas can again be 'notified' as Disturbed Areas as and when it is needed after security review, and therefore the 'idea' of withdrawal should be experimented at this juncture.
Pitching for 'partial' withdrawal of the Act, the chapter - dealing with the controversial law - has cited wishes of the people of the state, though it noted 'reservations' expressed by the Army against the 'withdrawal'.
Without disclosing contents of the report, Dileep Padgaonkar, who headed the three-member team of interlocutors, on Friday said he personally felt that the Disturbed Areas Act should be de-notified in certain districts that had not witnessed violence in the past six months or so. Government can periodically review the situation, and call the Army again if needed, he added.........http://epaper.timesofindia.com/Repository/ml.asp?Ref=Q0FQLzIwMTEvMTEvMTIjQXIwMTgwMg==&Mode=Gif&Locale=english-skin-custom