Sunday, December 21, 2014

COP20: Five pillars of strength ... mitigation, adaption, climate finance, technology transfer and capacity building

http://t.co/MKme0GGTH2


India says 'five pillars of strength' key to clinch climate deal

Vishwa Mohan,TNN | Dec 6, 2014, 05.12AM IST
Text resize:

LIMA: India — driven by domestic obligation of poverty eradication and food security — has sought to bring out in the open its expectations from the global climate agreement and insisted that the country would like to have a deal that has five pillars of strength which would help it and other developing countries meet basic needs of their population.

"We don't want a mitigation centric deal that is being pushed by developed countries as we want to grow to end poverty", said head of the Indian delegation Susheel Kumar while seeking to end any confusion over India's stand in run up to the Paris summit where a global climate deal is expected to be sealed in December next year.

He said, "India will not budge from its stand as it strongly believes that mitigation will alone not solve the problem".

The remarks came at a time when countries are preparing themselves for the crucial negotiation phase during the high-level segment, beginning next week when ministers of many countries would be here for the talks.

The main issues that are dividing countries here during the negotiations are centred on the excessive focus on mitigation (emission cut) by rich nations, which is opposed by the developing countries as they want focus on adaptation (preparing themselves to reduce the vulnerability and risk due to impact of climate change).

Emphasizing on a global adaptation goal in the climate deal, Kumar said, "It's a global problem so there should be a global solution. The manifestation of it may be local but the goal should be global".

Kumar, a senior environment and climate change ministry officer, also heads India's pollution watchdog. "We want all five key elements — Adaptation, Mitigation, Finance, Technology Transfer and Capacity Building — must be there in the global climate deal," he said.

As reported by the TOI, Kumar also formally stated that India would not announce its peaking year.

"We won't announce the peaking year only because other countries have done that or in the process of doing that", he said in a clear reference to China's recent announcement of its peaking year.

He said India was in no hurry to announce its targets and would do so when it was ready.

Without mincing words, Kumar made it clear that India was at a different stage of economic development and it was not in a position to tell the world about its peaking year at this juncture.

He, at the same time, emphasized that India was quite sensitive to the problem of climate change and therefore would voluntarily do its best to reduce its emission through a low-carbon growth path where role of clean energy would gradually increase.

Asked about the announcement of the country's Intended Nationally Determined Contributions (INDCs) as countries will now start finalizing its elements, the delegation head said, "There is no hurry to do that. We have been working on it. We will come out with our comprehensive and well worked out plan at an appropriate time".

Indicating that India would, hopefully, announce its INDCs in June next year, Kumar said, "We would know the template after conclusion of the ongoing Lima talks and we would work on it accordingly".

He also said India would be opposed to any review of its national contributions and asked if developed countries would mind an assessment of their financial commitments.

On the question whether India would follow Beijing's which favours a 10-year commitment period for the climate agreement in Paris, Kumar said, "We too may go for 10 years but certainly not five years as demanded by many rich nations".

Articulating the country's development needs, the Indian environment and climate change minister Prakash Javadekar in Delhi said, "India's stand at the Conference is be based on its domestic obligations of addressing the basic development needs of poverty eradication, food security and nutrition, universal access to education and health, gender equality and women empowerment, water and sanitation, clean energy, employment, sustainable cities and human settlement and its commitment to fight climate change".

He was addressing the media in New Delhi on the eve of his departure for Lima to take part in the high-level segment.

On INDCs, the minister said, "Intended Nationally Determined Contributions as part of 2015 agreement would be addressed in the context of enhanced actions and would include all issues - mitigation, adaptation, capacity building and transparency of action and support. The comprehensive INDC would also project the requirement of support in terms of finance and technology transfer. It would cover all the national missions and other initiatives under national action plan on climate change as well as state action plans on climate change".

--- http://epaperbeta.timesofindia.com//Article.aspx?eid=31808&articlexml=TOI-at-Lima-Five-pillars-of-strength-key-06122014020028#


COP20: Adaptation Gap report of the UNEP dropped a kind of bomb whenrich nations were reluctant to hear the word ADAPTATION

http://t.co/5dRADHUgBz


Climate adaptation costs soaring: UNEP report

Vishwa Mohan,TNN | Dec 6, 2014, 02.21AM IST
The UNEP report said, "The cost of adapting to climate change in developing countries is likely to reach two to three times the previous estimates of $70-100 billion per year by 2050".
Text resize:

LIMA: At the time when developing countries including India are pitching to have a global climate deal with "adaptation" goal as its key component, a UN body on Friday dropped a bombshell for rich nations, saying the cost of adapting to climate change is likely to reach up to $210-300 billion per year by 2050 even if the global greenhouse gas emissions are cut to keep the temperature rise below 2 degree Celsius this century.

This concern is expressed by the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) in its first Adaptation Gap Report, which clearly indicates that the rich countries need to give more to plug huge funding gap so that poor countries can adapt to drought, floods and heat waves caused by climate change.

The report also referred to one additional recent study that said "the annual average adaptation costs for South Asia alone were estimated at up to $40 billion".

It also clearly indicated that the only mitigation is not enough to save the world. The emission cut should be backed by adaptation measures which need substantial amount of money.

The UNEP report said, "The cost of adapting to climate change in developing countries is likely to reach two to three times the previous estimates of $70-100 billion per year by 2050".

Released during a crucial round of climate talks here, the Adaptation Gap Report serves as a preliminary assessment of global adaptation gaps in finance, technology and knowledge, and lays out a framework for future work on better defining and bridging these gaps.

The report finds that, despite adaptation funding by public sources reaching $23-26 billion in 2012-2013, there will be a significant funding gap after 2020 unless new and additional finance for adaptation is made available.

The remarks assume significance at the time when many reach countries including Australia, Austria, Belgium, Iceland, Portugal and Ireland have, so far, shown reluctance to spare any money for the Green Climate Fund (GCF) — a financial mechanism which is meant for helping out developing\poor countries to adapt themselves to the adverse impact of the climate change.

Instead of a target of $100 billion per year to the GCF by 2020, the rich nations have, so far, pledged only $9.95 billion by Friday with the Norway announcing to provide additional $258 million to the Fund over the next four years.

"As world leaders meet in Lima to take the critical next step in realizing a global agreement on climate change, this report underlines the importance of including comprehensive adaptation plans in the agreement," said Achim Steiner, executive director of UNEP and under secretary-general of the United Nations.

"National authorities and the international community should take the necessary steps to ensure the funding, technology and knowledge gaps are addressed in future planning and budgeting," he said.

He emphasized that the report provides a powerful reminder that the potential cost of inaction carries a real price tag.

"Debating the economics of our response to climate change must become more honest," he added.



The Adaptation Gap Report, produced in collaboration with 19 leading institutions and research centres from across the globe, expands upon the earlier estimates ($70-100 billion per year by 2050) by including new national and sector studies in its analyses and modelling.

The report finds that the earlier figures are likely to be a significant underestimate.

While the Adaptation Gap Report finds that the likely increase in adaptation costs with emissions reductions in place is two to three times higher, it points to the possibility of even greater expense.

"Extending the analysis to all developing countries indicates a chance that adaptation costs could climb as high as $150 billion by 2025/2030 and $250-500 billion per year by 2050", said a UNEP statement.

These costs are based on the assumption that further wide-ranging action is taken to cut emissions to the level required to meet the target of limiting global temperature rise this century to 2°C compared to pre-industrial levels.

The Adaptation Gap Report also highlights that least developed countries and small island developing states are likely to have far greater adaptation needs; without early efforts to implement adaptation in these countries, the existing adaptation gap will widen as greater financial resources will need to be committed later on.

The report noted that there is evidence that financial commitments to adaptation objectives have increased in recent years, and that adaptation is being increasingly integrated into development policies, but scaling up financial flows to adaptation remains a priority.

The report looks at the additional revenue that could be raised between 2015-2050 from a selected set of sources, such as: the international auctioning of emissions allowances and the auctioning of allowances in domestic emissions trading schemes, a carbon levy, revenues from international transportation, a wires charge, and financial transaction taxes.

"The report also highlights that there is a need to accelerate the propagation and international transfer of technologies for adaptation, many of which already exist. This, the report notes, requires governments to remove barriers to technology uptake, for example through incentives, regulations and the strengthening of institutions", said the UNEP statement.

As an example of successful technologies, the report looks at scientifically developed seeds, which can be used to sustain agriculture within the context of a changing climate — critical for most African countries given the dependence of large proportions of the population on farming.



The report also points to considerable scope for using existing knowledge on climate change and adaptation more effectively.

"For many regions and countries, there is a lack of systematic identification and analysis of adaptation knowledge gaps. Integrating and interpreting scientific evidence from different sources, and making it available to decision makers at all levels, is one of the most important knowledge needs today," said the statement.

--- http://epaperbeta.timesofindia.com//Article.aspx?eid=31808&articlexml=TOI-at-Lima-UN-report-Climate-adaptation-cost-07122014013022#


COP20: A move to make presence of SAARC felt during the Lima climate talks.... a joint move of eight South Asian countries

http://t.co/83whXNdFRY


Saarc joins hands in climate fight

Vishwa Mohan,TNN | Dec 5, 2014, 06.41AM IST
Text resize:

LIMA: India and its seven neighbours on Wednesday moved to make Saarc a separate pressure group to represent them at the climate talks here.

Saarc countries are part of one or more negotiating groups under UNFCCC. This move will allow them join hands afresh when China is no longer the country which will forcefully represent common interests following its bilateral deal with US.

"Saarc, as a group to represent eight countries, will be formalized once ministers of these nations arrive for talks at the high-level segment of the negotiations next week," delegation member of one of the countries said.

The group's first informal meeting was held on Wednesday at the office of Indian delegates at the COP 20 venue (20th edition of the Conference of the Parties). Officials of all eight countries agreed to formalize it next week. The move will help the Saarc group put across its views collectively ahead of the final climate deal in Paris next December. These countries initially agreed to formalize Saarc as a climate talks group during the formation's November conference in Kathmandu.

Narendra Modi and Nawaz Sharif, who attended the Saarc meet, agreed to the Maldives proposal to make the group a separate entity to represent all eight South Asia nations at Lima.Although Saarc as a climate negotiations group existed and represented these countries at three Conferences of the Parties (COP 2010-12) it went into hibernation after India became more active in another group - BASIC - with Brazil, South Africa and China.

--- http://epaperbeta.timesofindia.com//Article.aspx?eid=31808&articlexml=Saarc-joins-hands-in-climate-fight-05122014012023#


COP20: India makes strong pitch for adaptation ... treat it at par with mitigation

http://t.co/yXTLy9d2bo


Lima hunt for balanced clean-air solution

Vishwa Mohan,TNN | Dec 5, 2014, 06.43AM IST
Text resize:

LIMA: With countries here negotiating crucial points in the run up to next year's global climate agreement, India has made a strong pitch for weightage to "adaptation" measures in the new deal and sought a "goal for adaptation" like the "goal for mitigation" (emission cuts) in the new agreement.

India's demand came even as rich nations remain obsessed with "mitigation" efforts and goals. They believe setting "adaptation" targets would increase their burden of helping poorer nations with finance and technology transfer.

Amid indications that the country wouldn't announce its peaking year like China and would come out with its target only by June 2015, India declared: "Adaptation is critical to the country's development" model in view of climate change -a narrative which gained prominence after the NDA took office.

Without denying the importance of "mitigation" in facing climate-change challenges, India sought to include "adaptation" in the new agreement in a "balanced" manner.

In a submission to a `contact group' on adaptation here, Indian delegation head Susheel Kumar said: "When we say balance, it's not only political parity with mitigation. It is total parity -financial flow or allocations, legally binding status, technology transfer or sense of urgency and commitments".He emphasized: "We'd like a long-term global goal for adaptation...in qualitative and quantitative terms".

This is significant given India's position that the new treaty focuses more on "adaptation", not "mitigation" because poorer countries need to grow, which would lead to unavoidable emissions.

India wants rich countries to play a major role in mitigation, whereas adaptation efforts may compulsorily be made by every country with mandatory financial and technological support from developed nations.




Referring to a para in the draft text which talks of enhancing support to developing countries, Kumar said: "India would suggest amending this para to show that adaptation is a global commitment to be met by each country ."

He referred to India's recent initiative of establishing a National Adaptation Fund for financial, technical and capacity-building support at national and state level for adaptation activities.

India is likely to present its points on adaptation more forcefully at the high-level segment of the climate talks next week after Union environment and climate change minister Prakash Javadekar reaches here.



COP20: India sticks to its gun at Lima climate talks

http://t.co/fcbXNtJcan


India sticks to its gun during climate talks

Vishwa Mohan,TNN | Dec 3, 2014, 01.20AM IST
Text resize:

LIMA: With the world attention being shifted to India after the recent US-China bilateral climate agreement, New Delhi appears to be keen on positioning itself away from the Beijing's shadow. Indian government on Tuesday approved the "negotiating position" for the Lima climate talks, making it clear that the country would not compromise on the basic principles of the Kyoto Protocol.

India made it clear the equity and Common But Differentiated Responsibilities (CBDR) must be the basis of the global climate deal in Paris next year.

The CBDR is a principle which sees the rich nations including US, UK, France, Canada, Australia, France and Germany among others as historical polluters as these countries had been industrialized much before the developing countries and growing economies like India, China and Brazil. Therefore, it is their responsibility as past polluters to share the burden of current mitigation and adaptation measures.

Approving its "negotiating position" for Lima talks, the government of India's highest decision making body - the Union Cabinet - on Tuesday said that the approach of New Delhi "seeks to protect the interests of the country in climate change negotiations based on the principles of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC), and it`s Kyoto Protocol (KP)".

An official statement after the Union Cabinet meeting, chaired by the Prime Minister Narendra Modi, said, "It (negotiating position) would also enhance the solidarity among the developing countries on these issues". Though the official statement did not elaborate it further, it took note of the fact that the country would not deviate from its stated position at the time when the 20th edition of the Conference of the Parties (COP 20) in Lima is "expected to focus on the elements of 2015 Agreement and Intended Nationally Determined Contributions (INDCs)".

India's position was broadly cleared by the country's chief negotiator Ravi Shankar Prasad here in Lima while he was speaking during a side event - "Perspectives on the 2015 Paris deal: Options on the road from Lima to Paris ", organized by the Third World Network and the South Centre - on the first day of the COP 20 on Monday.

He pointed out that the countries have had not any meaningful discussions in the UNFCCC on the issue of intellectual property rights (IPRs) and technology transfer - a signal that India would take up the issue forcefully during the ongoing negotiations.

India has long been taken a stand that the rich nations should transfer technology to their poor counterparts free of cost by using the money of the Green Climate Fund (GCF). New Delhi has held a strong view that the GCF should buy the IPRs of the high-cost technology and it should be provided free of cost to the developing countries for helping them to adapt to face the challenges of the climate change and move on the low carbon growth path in coming years.

Prasad noted that the developing countries need assurance from the rich nations on the issue of technology transfer and financial support before providing their Intended Nationally Determined Contributions (INDCs).

Under the INDCs, countries are expected to announce their intended goals of adaptation and mitigation efforts\measures, based on their capabilities, by March next year. Indian position is based on the premise that the new regime under global climate deal must respect the rights of poor nations to develop so that every citizen can live and contribute meaningfully. Since the present COP is taking place in the backdrop of the recent bilateral climate deal between the US and China, it has drawn lot of attention on India.

Under the bilateral deal that was signed in Beijing last month, the US will reduce emissions by 26-28% below the 2005 levels by 2025 while China intends to achieve the peaking of carbon emissions around 2030 and make best efforts to peak early. Under the deal, Beijing also intends to increase the share of non-fossil fuels in primary energy consumption to around 20% by 2030.

Though the goals set out by both US and China are not seen as that ambitious if one looks at the proportion of emissions by these two countries as per their historical and current emissions, the resonance of the bilateral deal is all pervasive here in the context of a kind of bench-marking done by the two nations.

--- http://epaperbeta.timesofindia.com//Article.aspx?eid=31808&articlexml=TOI-at-Lima-India-sticks-to-its-guns-04122014013014#




COP20: UN Climate Talks kicked off in Lima



UN Climate talks kicked off in Lima

Vishwa Mohan,TNN | Dec 1, 2014, 11.05PM IST
Text resize:

LIMA: Amid hope to seal the climate deal in Paris next year, crucial negotiation under the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) was kicked off in Peruvian capital on Monday with key UN body appealing the world to step up their actions to deal with disastrous consequences of global warming.
How much burden each of the nations would share to save the world may be known only later in the run up to the Paris meeting, the current meetings — called COP20 (20th edition of the Conference of the Parties) — would, hopefully, throw lights on countries' priorities and willingness to move on low-carbon development path.
"Science offers clear rationale for climate action", said UN-backed Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) chairman R K Pachauriin his opening remark while sharing details of the recent scientific findings that predicted disastrous consequences of global warming for the world if the countries do not act fast to reduce their carbon emissions.
Appealing the world for immediate action,Pachauri said more the nations delay their adaptation and mitigation (cutting emission) measures, the cost of actions to deal with challenges of climate change would be more.
Environment ministers and other key representatives of over 190 countries are expected to join the conference for the high-level segment of the negotiation next week. Indian environment and climate change minister PrakashJavadekar is scheduled to leave Delhi for this important COP on December 5.
Since the present COP is happening in the backdrop of the recent bilateral climate deal between the US and China, it has drawn lot of attention among nations whose representatives may also try to figure out how effectively the two countries - the biggest historical emitter (US) and the world's top present polluter (China) - adhere to their promised goal and what course of actions they would take to reach their self-goals.
Though the goals set out by both US and China are not that ambitious if one look at the proportion of emissions by these two countries, the resonance of the bilateral deal is all pervasive here.
Under the bilateral deal that was signed in Beijing last month, the US will reduce emissions by 26-28% below the 2005 levels by 2025. China, on its part, intends to achieve the peaking of carbon emissions around 2030 and make best efforts to peak early and intends to increase the share of non-fossil fuels in primary energy consumption to around 20% by 2030.
Whatever be their targets, the attention is, obviously, now on India due to that deal.

Friday, August 1, 2014

You are killing the forests ..... be prepared to get killed

http://t.co/cI3Ccg4It0


Tree truths: Dense forests mowed down and new, sparse cover can't hold the soil

Vishwa Mohan,TNN | Aug 1, 2014, 06.33AM IST

Text resize:

NEW DELHI: The government's recent report announcing an increase in forest cover looks more like a case of the state agency playing the slippery slope of statistics. Wednesday's landslide in Maharashtra's Ambegaon and last year's flash floods and landslides in Uttarakhand may in reality indicate a trend likely to recur across the country - as over the years huge tracts of 'dense' forests having the capacity to hold soil and protect slopes have been lost.

Most of the increase in forest cover has been in 'open forest area'. This is non-dense forest, barely enough to be considered a green patch that may reap ecological benefits decades later. Forest Survey of India (FSI) records show the country increased its forest cover by 57,791 sq km in past 20 years but 45,376 sq km of it is 'open forest area' category. Environmentalists call it a recipe for disaster as India keeps clearing 'dense' forest cover having the capacity to hold soil/ protect the slopes for various projects.

Referring to Pune and Uttarakhand disasters, environmentalist and CSE chief Sunita Narain said, "It's become far more important to protect forests and mountains. Climate change will see more extreme weather events in future. We have to adopt new technology to construct roads and implement other unavoidable projects so that slopes of the mountains are not affected."

She emphasized that the indiscriminate clearing of forests was a matter of grave concern. The environment ministry's records show impending loss of dense cover in many parts, mostly in mineral-rich Jharkhand, Chhattisgarh, Madhya Pradesh and Odisha. While 2.43 lakh ha of forests had been cleared for various projects under the UPA regime (2004-13), proposals to clear 3.30 lakh ha of forests are pending before the new government. This, in addition to the total 11,89,294 ha of forest land diverted for 23,511 projects in different states since 1980.

Afforestation efforts by states and UTs across 20.7 lakh ha over the past 14 years are not seen as being beneficial in the short-term. Compensating loss of old dense forest area with new plantation and roadside trees is not seen as a solution. New forest covers will take ages before becoming the stabilizing factor that will prevent natural disasters. Forest campaigner of Greenpeace India Nandikesh Sivalingam said, "Forests are a major stabilizing component that protect soil and water and reduce floods and landslides. Deforestation and forest degradation due to reckless infrastructure development, agriculture and mining are primary causes for landslides." 

Questioning the environment ministry's current view on faster clearances for infrastructure projects, he said, "Increasing frequency of clearances makes it clear that mismanagement of environment is damaging not only the economy but also human lives". Disaster management expert Sq Ldr (retd) Krishan Mitroo agrees, "Time has come to stop playing with nature. If you want to go for development, secure the hills first by adopting scientific methods."