Sunday, March 22, 2015

Interview of Robert C Orr, principal policy adviser to the UN secretary-general Ban Ki-moon

'Paris is not the end point. It's a launching pad'

Vishwa Mohan, TNN | March 8, 2015

NEW DELHI: "Paris is not the end point. It's a launching pad", said Robert C Orr, principal policy adviser to the  UN secretary-general Ban Ki-moon, while expressing his confidence in the commitment given by countries across the world to sign a climate deal in the French capital later this year. 

Orr, who was in India to take part in a series of deliberations on New Delhi's renewable energy goals, also said he was very encouraged by the effort of all stakeholders, including government, private and civil society in the country to work towards a climate deal. 

Amid apprehensions whether Paris pact would be strong enough to save the world from disastrous consequences of climate change, Orr, in an interview to TOI, said it won't be a deal which will be signed and then implemented once and for all. 

"It will have to be re-tuned and fine-tuned every single year. Countries will meet every year and explain what all they are doing to cut their emissions of greenhouse gases and this is the genius of the new regime that is taking shape", said the UN assistant secretary-general. 

Orr, who has been advising  Ban Ki-moon on energy, food security and global health for years, during his conversations also appeared to be quite optimistic of countries' commitments in the form of their  Intended National Determined Contributions(INDCs). The INDCs will form the basis of the negotiations in run up to the final climate deal.

UN official: Paris meet will be a launching pad

"We don't need to look at this negotiation as a zero sum game. In fact, we can't. It is not that one part gains and another loses. In fact, we'll all gain if we get a good deal and we'll all lose if we get a bad deal", said Orr. 

Asked what if INDCs taken together failed to keep temperature rise below 2 degree celsius by 2100 from pre-industrialization levels, the UN assistant secretary-general said, "Once the countries provide their INDCs, the negotiators will see whether it's adequate or not. 

"We should keep in mind that these (INDCs) will be for period beyond 2020. So, there will be nearly five years from now and 2020. It would be the most important five years in the future of our planet". 

His remarks were made just days before countries started submitting their INDCs to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) which expects all rich countries to submit their respective 'climate action plans' by month end. 

So far, Switzerland and European Union (group of 28 countries) have submitted their plans to the UNFCCC, detailing their emission-cut goals. 

Though India is expected to come out with its action plan in June, officials here felt that there are still many issues which need to be clarified before the country would submit its INDC. 

Articulating India's stand, country's environment and climate change minister Prakash Javadekar during his speech at African Ministerial Conference on Environment at Cairo, Egypt on Wednesday said, "As we formulate INDCs, certain issues need immediate attention. One of those is technology transfer along with knowhow at an affordable cost, so that we are able to move expeditiously towards lowering of the energy intensity of our economic growth and improving energy efficiency in various sectors". 

He also said, "As we all prepare ourselves for the Paris meeting of the Conference of the Parties (COP21), we need to recognize that both adaptation and mitigation must be accorded equal importance".

Interview of former US vice president Al Gore

Differences between Democrats and Republicans in the US will not cloud prospects of a strong climate deal in  Paris later this year. Al Gore

Vishwa Mohan, TNN | February 24, 2015

NEW DELHI: Climate change crusader and former US vice-president  Al Gore does not think differences between Democrats and Republicans in his home country will cloud prospects of a strong climate deal that is expected to be inked in  Paris later this year. In an interview to TOI, the academy award winning star of the documentary , 'The Inconvenient Truth', spoke on a range of issues. They included the global response to India's clean energy market and the benefits of Deep Space Climate Observatory , which emerged from an idea proposed by him in 1998. Excerpts:


Q. Will differences between Democrats and Republicans over climate change issues cast its shadow over the prospect of a strong climate deal? 

No. It will not. The concerns are certainly understandable because the extreme partisan division in my country have interfered with the development of some policies. Climate is, however, an exception. Because the  Supreme Court has issued a ruling that a previously passed law known as the Clean Air Act actually applies to the reduction of green house gases. 

The issue before the court was whether or not the phrase harmful air pollutants applies to global warming pollution and the Supreme Court issued an opinion stating that the law does apply. Now the significance of this is that President  Obama has the existing authority without any subsequent action by the Congress to mandate the reduction of pollution which causes global warming. 

Now, the second basis for the concern you described has to do with the Senate's constitutional role in approving treaties. But the Paris agreement is being designed in a way that it does not fit that description and it does not require  Senate approval. 

Q. Only nine months are left to Paris, but many differences exist between developed and developing countries over extent of INDC, mitigation versus adaptation issues or ex-ante review. Do you think the negotiations in run-up to Paris would end those differences? 

Yes, I think a deal is virtually certain. And, one reason for my confidence is that this new process designed for the Paris negotiations allows significant flexibility depending upon national circumstances. 

The old rigid differentiation between the developed and developing countries no longer applies the way it once did. 

The agreement between the US and China is just the latest evidence of this fact. 

Q. What do you mean by those great many changes that may drive the world to have an equi table climate deal in Paris without affecting their economies? 

The stunning developments and improvements to renewable energy technology and the sharp reduction in the cost of electricity from solar and wind and realization of the enormous opportunity available in enhanced energy efficiency have changed the de bate in a fairly dramatic way. 

I believe that this is a new chapter in the same story the world had witnessed with the telecom communication where mobile phones have almost replaced the old landline technologies. 

Distributed energy resources mainly by rooftop solar along with solar fields and wind mills are now not only competitive with the electricity made from the burning of coal but actually is cheaper in many regions and even as the cost of coal goes up, the cost of solar and wind continues to go down year after year after year. 

Page 2 of 2

NEW DELHI: Climate change crusader and former US vice-president Al Gore does not think differences between Democrats and Republicans in his home country will cloud prospects of a strong climate deal that is expected to be inked in Paris later this year. In an interview to TOI, the academy award winning star of the documentary , 'The Inconvenient Truth', spoke on a range of issues. They included the global response to India's clean energy market and the benefits of Deep Space Climate Observatory , which emerged from an idea proposed by him in 1998. Excerpts: 


Q. Will differences between Democrats and Republicans over climate change issues cast its shadow over the prospect of a strong climate deal? 

No. It will not. The concerns are certainly understandable because the extreme partisan division in my country have interfered with the development of some policies. Climate is, however, an exception. Because the Supreme Court has issued a ruling that a previously passed law known as the Clean Air Act actually applies to the reduction of green house gases. 

The issue before the court was whether or not the phrase harmful air pollutants applies to global warming pollution and the Supreme Court issued an opinion stating that the law does apply. Now the significance of this is that President Obama has the existing authority without any subsequent action by the Congress to mandate the reduction of pollution which causes global warming. 

Now, the second basis for the concern you described has to do with the Senate's constitutional role in approving treaties. But the Paris agreement is being designed in a way that it does not fit that description and it does not require Senate approval. 

Q. Only nine months are left to Paris, but many differences exist between developed and developing countries over extent of INDC, mitigation versus adaptation issues or ex-ante review. Do you think the negotiations in run-up to Paris would end those differences? 

Yes, I think a deal is virtually certain. And, one reason for my confidence is that this new process designed for the Paris negotiations allows significant flexibility depending upon national circumstances. 

The old rigid differentiation between the developed and developing countries no longer applies the way it once did. 

The agreement between the US and China is just the latest evidence of this fact. 

Q. What do you mean by those great many changes that may drive the world to have an equi table climate deal in Paris without affecting their economies? 

The stunning developments and improvements to renewable energy technology and the sharp reduction in the cost of electricity from solar and wind and realization of the enormous opportunity available in enhanced energy efficiency have changed the de bate in a fairly dramatic way. 

I believe that this is a new chapter in the same story the world had witnessed with the telecom communication where mobile phones have almost replaced the old landline technologies. 

Distributed energy resources mainly by rooftop solar along with solar fields and wind mills are now not only competitive with the electricity made from the burning of coal but actually is cheaper in many regions and even as the cost of coal goes up, the cost of solar and wind continues to go down year after year after year. 


Q. India wants to move on the renewable energy path. But, costs and technology drawbacks are big issues. Do you think it would make good business sense for investors to invest in India? 

I think the size and attractiveness of the renewable energy market and energy efficiency market in India is looming as one of biggest business opportunities in the entire history of the world. Everyone knows that India's growth rate will soon be faster than China's. India will be the largest market in the world in this century . So, the kind of rush that you saw the business around the world were trying to get into China in the last decade, you are going to see that for India. 

Q. Will the Deep Space Climate Observatory (DSCOVR) help the scientific community solve some climatic mystery? What can the world achieve from this ambitious launch? 

Yes. The satellite placed in deep space will orbit the sun in tandem with the earth. It will always stay in between the earth and the sun and from that vantage point, the instruments on this satellite will be able to give us for the very first time an accurate energy budget for the entire earth and the entire planetary system. Secondly , we will able to get for the first time an accurate assessment of vegetative cover on the earth. 

Interview of French minister of ecology, sustainable development and energy Segolene Royal

There is but one planet and we must work together to save it: Segolene Royal

Vishwa Mohan, TNN | February 6, 2015

NEW DELHI: French minister of ecology, sustainable development and energy  Segolene Royalinvokes  Rabindranath Tagore as she urges nations to work together to save the planet from disastrous consequences of climate change. In an interview to TOI, Royal pitches for "clean transport and electricity" to wipe out air pollution. Excerpts: 

Q. Do you think a strong climate deal is possible when developing countries insist on giving more emphasis to adaptation than on mitigation (emission cuts)? 

A. You have to act on both fronts. India has already made significant efforts in this area. The goals set by the new government are ambitious. Prime Minister Modi announced the target of 100 gw from solar energy by 2020. Clean transport and electricity are also needed for cleansing air pollution in cities. 

Q. What is France, as host country of the next climate conference (COP21), planning to offer in the form of its INDC (Intended Nationally Determined Contribution) to strike a global climate deal in Paris in December? 

A. France is acting to lead by example, first through the law on energy transition towards green growth, which I drafted and got voted in the National Assembly and which concerns all the challenges of  climate change, and the preparation for a post-oil era. France has opted for an energy mix of energy saving measures, nuclear energy and renewable energy. Europe has set itself the ambition of achieving the goals of reducing greenhouse gas emissions by at least 40% by 2030 from 1990 levels, increasing energy efficiency by 27%, and a renewable energy share of 27%. This is also a way of generating jobs. A major drive is on for waste treatment and converting waste into energy. 

Q. Rich nations including France have so far contributed very little to the Green Climate Fund (GCF). Will France increase its contribution? 

A. France was actually one of the first countries to contribute to the fund with $1 billion. This is really a major contribution as this enabled the fund to attain the $10 billion mark right since the Lima Conference in December last year. The issue today is to swiftly decide how these resources will be used, because we must help the least developed countries to protect themselves from climate disruption and adapt to the changes of energy transition. This fund is to be supplemented with contributions from the private sector to reach the $100 billion mark. France has also committed bilaterally to increasing its financing support to climate-related projects. 

Q. What will France's stand be as far as ex-ante review of country goals is concerned in view of strong opposition to it by most of the developing countries, including India and China? 

A. I don't think that a country's attachment to its sovereignty and the necessity of reaching an agreement to face the dangers of climate disruption are mutually exclusive. This is what should guide us: there is but one planet and we must work together to save it. Being true to yourself and working with others go hand in hand. Often, during our climate debates, I think of these lovely words of Tagore, "I have had my invitation to this world's festival... and I have done all I could." We have also met the Chinese negotiator, who was quite constructive. 

Q. What is the solution for countries that need to grow at the cost of carbon emissions as they want to improve the living conditions of their citizens through economic growth and energy access? 

A. The more we wait, the more it will cost, and the worse the impact. Solutions are within reach and that's a good thing for our countries. India is a great country with engineers, scientists and talented people who can contribute to the new energy model, which reconciles the aspirations for growth and access to carbon-free energy. If nothing is done, climate disruption will lead to many disasters. So, we must act and we must consider this as a chance to think and act differently.

Saturday, March 21, 2015

Obama-Modi stress enhancing bilateral cooperation to deal with climate change

Obama-Modi climate deal: Unlike China, no emission target for India

Vishwa Mohan\TNN January 26, 2015
NEW DELHI: India and the US on Sunday stressed enhancing bilateral cooperation to deal with climate change but did not have a China-like bilateral deal where both Washington and Beijing last November set their respective emission cut goals. 

Despite international pressure, India walked its own path keeping economic development in mind and insisted on tackling climate change by moving firmly on the clean, renewable energy path, adopting improved energy efficient technology and through various adaptation measures. 

Both countries concluded negotiations on a five-year MoU on "energy security, clean energy and climate change". An agreement to this effect is expected "as early as possible" at a mutually agreed date. The US will help India achieve its goals, including 100GW of solar power by 2022, by extending finance and technology. 

YOU HEARD IT HERE FIRST: US rules out China-like climate deal with India in near future 

India, on its part, moved forward to accommodate Obama's demand to discuss the contentious issue of hydro-fluorocarbons (HFCs) and find ways to phase-down this climate-damaging refrigerant. Articulating India's stand on climate change, the PM Modi dismissed the assertion that India was under pressure of the recent US-China climate change deal and said the country feels the pressure of climate change for it cares for its future generations. 

In his opening remark at a joint media interaction with Obama, Modi insisted on adaptation measures and moving on the clean, renewable energy path to tackle climate change and asked US to "lead international efforts in making renewable energy accessible and affordable". 

READ ALSO: India trying to build climate for energy talks with US 

Modi said, "For Obama and me, clean and renewable energy is a personal and national priority. We discussed our ambitious national efforts and goals to increase the use of clean and renewable energy. We agreed to enhance our excellent and innovative partnership in this". 

Both leaders reaffirmed their prior understanding to deepen India-US collaboration in other fields, including science, technology, innovation and agriculture. As far as the controversial HFCs is concerned, India reaffirmed its September, 2014 understanding with the US and agreed to "cooperate on making concrete progress in the Montreal Protocol this year".

Tuesday, December 30, 2014

IPCC chief's take on future of the UN body on climate change ....Post-COP20 interview

http://t.co/2ZbbwxzhxC


Pachauri: IPCC future not tied to Paris climate deal

Vishwa Mohan,TNN | Dec 30, 2014, 04.43AM IST
Text resize:

NEW DELHI: The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), the leading UN body for the assessment of climate change, will continue its work, no matter whether countries arrive at a global climate deal next year in Paris or not. Its successive science-based reports had always been key inputs for negotiators in the past over two decades.

The IPCC had come out with its last (fifth) assessment report in November ahead of the Lima climate talks. It is also most likely to come out with its sixth assessment report in future, bringing more scientific information to the table for policy-makers and general public on causes and impact of climate-damaging greenhouse gases released into the atmosphere.

Amid speculation over the future of the IPCC once it submitted its 'synthesis' report, its chairman R K Pachauri said his expectation was that the body would also come out with the sixth assessment report (AR6) and a decision in this regard would hopefully be taken by member countries in February, 2015.

"Whether it is going to be structurally identical to the fifth assessment report (AR5) or whether it would be different would be clearer by the end of February when the next plenary of the IPCC takes place", he told the TOI.

Asked about future of this Nobel Prize winning UN body, Pachauri said, "I think the work of the IPCC will continue as there is also growing desire on the part of the scientific community across the world to contribute to the work".

The IPCC is a scientific body which reviews and assesses the most recent scientific, technical and socio-economic information produced worldwide relevant to the understanding of climate change. It was established in 1988 to provide the world with a clear scientific view on the current state of knowledge in climate change and its potential environmental and socio-economic impacts.

The body has since then come out with five successive assessment reports, telling the global community how human activities are playing havoc with environment and how it led to extreme weather events, melting of glaciers and acidification of oceans due to global warming.

Pachauri said, "It seems to me that the result of the fifth assessment report would perhaps only strengthen the need for carrying out updated assessment. Given the fact that we have a lot more information and knowledge in this report (AR5) than what we had in AR4 and similarly the AR4 had much more as compared to the AR3. This only strengthens the need for coming out with successive assessment".

It was the IPCC second assessment report (AR2) of 1995 that had provided important material and key inputs to negotiators in the run-up to adoption of the Kyoto Protocol in 1997.

On its present task, the IPCC chief said, "We, in the immediate future, are going to ensure that the findings of the synthesis report are spread and made known to communities all over the world. This is going to be something which I personally will be focusing on in the next six to eight months".

---- http://epaperbeta.timesofindia.com/Article.aspx?eid=31808&articlexml=Pachauri-IPCC-future-not-tied-to-Paris-climate-30122014014032#





Wednesday, December 24, 2014

COP20: Interview of IPCC chairman R K Pachauri on outcome of the Lima climate talks, fate of GCF and future of the UN body on climate change

http://t.co/KeTlJDEkOG


AND




Rich nations would contribute to the Green Climate Fund once all the countries provide their INDCs: R K Pachauri

Vishwa Mohan,TNN | Dec 23, 2014, 10.09PM IST
Text resize:

NEW DELHI: At the time when developing world is worried about the rich nations' reluctance for contributing to the Green Climate Fund (GCF), the chairman of the UN's Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) R K Pachauri believes that the developed world would come forward substantially with the finance once all the countries provide their 'Intended Nationally Determined Contributions' (INDCs) - a clear roadmap of their voluntary actions to fight the threat of climate change.

Pachauri, who is also member of the Prime Minister Narendra Modi's Council on Climate Change, in an interview to TOI spoke on a range of issues including the course of action India should take to go on low- carbon growth path, outcome of the Lima climate talks, future of the IPCC and the GCF that is meant for helping out developing countries for their mitigation and adaptation actions.

He said the countries in Lima had, at least, come up with a framework for a kind of agreement that the world would get in Paris in December next year in the form of a global climate deal. He said the rich nations would, hopefully, contribute to the GCF once all the countries provide their INDCs next year. The IPCC chairman also opened up on the future of the UN body on climate change, saying it will continue to work and there is a possibility of sixth assessment report.

Excerpts:

Q. How you see the outcome of the Lima climate conference?

A. Lima outcome has, at least, come up with a framework for a kind of agreement that we would get in Paris. I don't know whether this is enough or not, but now we have at least a concrete basis on which we will carry out our negotiations. Every country will provide their INDCs on certain basis (elements) and will see whether it would be enough to meet the goal of keeping the temperature rise below 2 degree Celsius this century. So, Lima to that extent is a beginning but we have to build on that.

I am glad, at least now we have an agreement or a sort of building blocks of any agreement with the INDCs. What these INDCs will turn out to be country by country is left to be seen and of course will also be left open to scrutiny because all of this is now going to be transparent.

Q. There has been reluctance on the part of rich nations to contribute to the GCF. Do you see any change of stand in future? Will more money come to the fund, beyond the existing sum of over 10 billion US dollars in the kitty? 

A. It seems to me that once you get the INDCs from all the countries and if they find that these INDCs don't add up to what is required then the next step would be to see how you can make it happen. In the developing countries, you have to provide resources to make it happen. I hope that will convince the developed countries that we are all in it together and if we have to stabilize the earth climate, this money has to be provided. Otherwise, we won't reach the kind of result which we want.

Finance would be required to take mitigation and adaptation measures. It is to be found out how those finances can be made available for enhancing the GCF. So, I think there lots need to be looked at and there is lot more attention that needs to be provided to it. I hope it happens once the INDCs come together and see the gap in terms of funding and the gap in terms of reducing emission.

Q. What would you like to suggest the PM council on climate change in India in view of rising demand to cut emission at the time when the country needs to develop to fulfill its obligation to poor citizens?

A. India has to do much more on adaptation to face the impact of climate change. We have not paid enough attention on it. We have many regulations but we are not sure whether these are being properly observed at local level. Therefore, local government has to be strengthened if we want to carry out adaptation measures.

There is a whole range of things. Even in agriculture, the impacts of climate change are going to be serious and therefore we have to start preparing for that and possibly to bring about shift not only in agriculture practices but even in crop patterns.

On the mitigation front, I would say that the India has a very serious challenge of energy security. We need to use energy more efficiently. That would require a major restructuring in many sectors specifically transport, industry and building. We should also start looking at the mix of energy supply that we need for the future.

Q. How can country meet its growing energy need?

A. India has abundance of renewable energy sources. We should go for it in a big way. It will also give us lower emission of greenhouse gases. It is time we should start shaping our policy in a way that renewable sources of energy, at least where it is economically viable, get utilized. Once the country moves on this path with clear policy, finance will, hopefully, not be a problem.

Q. What is the future of the IPCC as it has already submitted its report\findings? Will this UN body continue? If yes, then in what form? 

A. As far as the IPCC is concerned, we in the immediate future are going to ensure that the findings of the synthesis report are spread and made known to communities all over the world. This is going to be something which I personally will be focusing on in the next six to eight months. But over a longer period of time, the governments are now in a state of decision making discussion on what the next cycle of the IPCC should be.

My expectation is that there will be a sixth assessment report (AR6). Whether it is going to be structurally identical to the fifth assessment report (AR5) or whether it would be different would be clearer by the end of February when the plenary of the IPCC takes place.

It seems to me that the result of the fifth assessment report would perhaps only strengthen the need for carrying out updated assessment. Given the fact that we have a lot more information and knowledge in this report (AR5) than what we had in AR4 and similarly the AR4 had much more as compared to the AR3. This only strengthens the need for coming out with successive assessment.

In essence, I think the work of the IPCC will continue as there is also growing desire on the part of the scientific community to contribute.


Tuesday, December 23, 2014

COP20: 'Goal of mobilizing 100 billion US dollars per year by 2020 is still a far cry'

http://t.co/zSUld5NNpB


Rich nations are penny-pinching: Prakash Javadekar

Vishwa Mohan,TNN | Dec 23, 2014, 12.45AM IST
“This is especially relevant in view of the action of some countries, which had gone back on their Kyoto Protocol commitments. The Lima conference agreed that the contribution of countries has to be more than their current commitments”, said Javadekar.
Text resize:

NEW DELHI: A week after conclusion of the Lima climate talks, India on Monday lamented that rich nations have failed to deliver adequately on the issue of finance and said the "goal of mobilizing 100 billion US dollars per year by 2020 is still a far cry".

READ ALSO: Lima deal saves climate talks, India satisfied

The concern was expressed by the Union environment and climate change minister Prakash Javadekar in his suo moto statement in Parliament on the Lima climate talks and India's position during the crucial negotiating rounds in the Peruvian capital.

Though Javadekar, who had led the Indian delegation at talks, expressed his satisfaction over the broad outcome of the Lima climate conference, he underlined the difficulties involved on the issue of finance where rich nations did not come up to expectation of the developing countries.

READ ALSO: Govt shares outcome of Lima climate talks with Parliament

Referring to the pledge of only over $10 billion, made by rich nations, against the actual target of $100 billion per year by 2020, Javadekar said it was decided at Lima to "urge" contributors to confirm pledges in the form of "fully executed contribution agreements" so that at least 50% of promises made till November this year should be fully executed by April 30, 2015.

The minister of state for environment, forest and climate change, Prakash Javadekar speaks at a high-level segment of UNFCCC conference of parties in Lima. (PTI photo)
The finance issue had come up during the talks in the context of capitalization of the Green Climate Fund (GCF) that was created as a financial instrument to help developing countries for their ambitious mitigation (emission cut) and adaptation actions. The rich nations are supposed to contribute to the GCF for the purpose.

It was agreed in Lima that the new agreement will address all elements that are mitigation, adaptation, finance, technology development and transfer, capacity building and transparency of action and support in a balanced manner.

READ ALSO: Paris climate talks may have to pay for Lima compromise

Referring to the outcome, Javadekar in Lok Sabha said, "The recognition that all elements need to be addressed in a balanced manner is a key outcome of the Conference as there were efforts by some developed countries to undermine the basic tenets of the Convention".

Besides recognizing all elements as key ingredients of the future climate deal, it was decided that the countries should not backslide from current pledges.

"This is especially relevant in view of the action of some countries, which had gone back on their Kyoto Protocol commitments. The Lima conference agreed that the contribution of countries has to be more than their current commitments", said Javadekar.

Speaking about India's position, the minister said, "Our main task was to protect India's long term interests and emphasize the need for growth and development space to tackle the problem of eradicating poverty, providing energy access to all and address other developmental priorities.

"In this endeavour, we were guided by the vision of the government and Cabinet mandate. Our stand in the negotiations was also guided by the principle of 'Equity' and Common but Differentiated Responsibilities (CBDRs), which is the bedrock principle of the UNFCCC".